A A A
Site Admin
It’s kind of funny thinking about it, but there are certainly “types” of otherkin that are more common than others. Â Dragons and Elves, for instance, are a dime a dozen. Â But what about goblins? Â Satyrs are not quite so common, but they’re not exactly rare either. Â But I’ve never seen a centaur otherkin. Â Why are some species so common, and some so exotic, even in cases like centaurs where they are both well-known and fairly popular in the human population? Â And what are the more unusual kinds you’ve come across yourself? Â (Ones you actually believe, not “toaster-kin” )
Ancient of Days
Fambly
You must also consider how many people claiming to be the more popular types of otherkin are either faking it, bullshitting, or deluding themselves. The numbers may end up being smaller than they look, but fuck if I’m qualified to tell which is which (though, that said, it’s fairly easy to pick out the ones that seem content to live in their fantasyworlds.
Do gryphons count? I suspect they’d be much like satyrs. Most of the alleged “gryphonkin” I’ve seen online either frequent therianthropy boards more, or are odd combinations of creatures (a goose and a saluki being one of the more unusual combinations) not even remotely documented in mythologies containing gryphons. Then you must also consider whether or not gryphons are really composite beings, or simply SEEN and described as such by humans, who had no other point of reference. A real-life example of this was the seahorse. Earlier peoples didn’t see it as a fish, but more a combination of a horse and a serpent, or a dragon.
Also, there are the Vanara, a race of monkey-like humans or sentient monkeys with exceptional strength and cunning. In the East, monkeys were the “berserkers”, as they possessed strength beyond their weight and size (for example, a full grown female Rhesus macaque can kill a large dog and hospitalize a full-grown human male). Even the vanara are said to live with, or have been birthed from, bears (though there is no proven east/west connection, it is an interesting correlary nonetheless). Although I do not consider myself blood-related to the vanara, at one point in my past, from what I can vaguely recall, I was raised from birth by vanaras, and became physiologically and behaviorally imprinted to them (developing enhanced canines, a long tail, and bear-like claws).
As for goblins…well, goblins aren’t glamorous and pretty enough. Duh.
~Tenshi
Normal Member
Ancient of Days
Fambly
Claude said:
Jarandhel Dreamsinger said:
Why are some species so common, and some so exotic, even in cases like centaurs where they are both well-known and fairly popular in the human population? Â
Â
Because there aren’t any recent movies featuring them?
Â
Fuck you. I really am Na’vi kin and I’m special dammit. Everyone should know it, too.
~
Site Admin
I edited your post to fix the link. Â HTML only works if you click on the HTML button and bring up the HTML view.
Â
technobushi said:
You must also consider how many people claiming to be the more popular types of otherkin are either faking it, bullshitting, or deluding themselves. The numbers may end up being smaller than they look, but fuck if I’m qualified to tell which is which (though, that said, it’s fairly easy to pick out the ones that seem content to live in their fantasyworlds.
That’s the thing, though… some of the types which should be popular aren’t, even among the fakers. Â Take centaurs, I’ve seen tons of people who wish they were centaurs online. Â I’ve seen zero people claiming to be centaur otherkin, even after media events which should have popularized them further such as the Narnia movie or some of the Harry Potter movies or the Percy Jackson movie or even things like Hercules and Xena. Â I’ve seen tons of people claiming to be kitsune and oni otherkin, but I could probably count on one hand the inugami or the bakaneko, and I don’t think I’ve ever heard of a tanuki otherkin. Â Something just seems odd about that.
Do gryphons count? I suspect they’d be much like satyrs. Most of the alleged “gryphonkin” I’ve seen online either frequent therianthropy boards more, or are odd combinations of creatures (a goose and a saluki being one of the more unusual combinations) not even remotely documented in mythologies containing gryphons. Then you must also consider whether or not gryphons are really composite beings, or simply SEEN and described as such by humans, who had no other point of reference. A real-life example of this was the seahorse. Earlier peoples didn’t see it as a fish, but more a combination of a horse and a serpent, or a dragon.
Apart from the obvious handful we both know, the only gryphons I’ve really come across were the Gryphon Guild, and that seemed to be more for enthusiasts than gryphon kin necessarily. Â Maybe they do hang out more on the therianthropy boards. Â Any centaurs or satyrs over there? Â
Also, there are the Vanara, a race of monkey-like humans or sentient monkeys with exceptional strength and cunning. In the East, monkeys were the “berserkers”, as they possessed strength beyond their weight and size (for example, a full grown female Rhesus macaque can kill a large dog and hospitalize a full-grown human male). Even the vanara are said to live with, or have been birthed from, bears (though there is no proven east/west connection, it is an interesting correlary nonetheless). Although I do not consider myself blood-related to the vanara, at one point in my past, from what I can vaguely recall, I was raised from birth by vanaras, and became physiologically and behaviorally imprinted to them (developing enhanced canines, a long tail, and bear-like claws).
Now that is an unusual type of otherkin. Â I doubt most people in the community would even be familiar with the mythology that comes from.
As for goblins…well, goblins aren’t glamorous and pretty enough. Duh.
Well, I have run into one. Â Just one. Â But if that were the reason, I’d think we’d be getting fewer Oni overall… they’re not exactly pretty either, are they?
Site Admin
Claude said:
Because there aren’t any recent movies featuring them?
Well, Centaurs have a bunch of recent movies with them in prominent roles… Chronicles of Narnia, Harry Potter (Firenze), Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief… and Satyrs at the very least have Pan’s Labyrinth and Percy Jackson. Â At this point I’d say they’re at least as well represented as elves. Â Elves really only have the Lord of the Rings movies, and it’s been a while since those were out. Â And what have dragons had lately besides Eragon and How to Train Your Dragon?
Ancient of Days
Jarandhel Dreamsinger said:
It’s kind of funny thinking about it, but there are certainly “types” of otherkin that are more common than others. Â Dragons and Elves, for instance, are a dime a dozen. Â But what about goblins? Â Satyrs are not quite so common, but they’re not exactly rare either. Â But I’ve never seen a centaur otherkin. Â Why are some species so common, and some so exotic, even in cases like centaurs where they are both well-known and fairly popular in the human population? Â And what are the more unusual kinds you’ve come across yourself? Â (Ones you actually believe, not “toaster-kin” )
Â
I have never seen a dwarf otherkin either. I seem to recall one person off the old mailing lists who was an orc. That’s probably the most unusual one I’ve personally encountered.
Site Admin
Let’s see if I can write this post without breaking the site this time… (found and hopefully fixed a bug from the move.)
Â
casteylan said:
Â
I have never seen a dwarf otherkin either. I seem to recall one person off the old mailing lists who was an orc. That’s probably the most unusual one I’ve personally encountered.
Supposedly there’s a MySpace Group for Dwarven Otherkin. Â I don’t know if it’s genuine, though, or another group created for the purpose of mocking otherkin like The LJ Slimy Community.
Site Admin
Ancient of Days
Jarandhel Dreamsinger said:
Oh, also, if movies were all it took to create popular otherkin types, shouldn’t we have seen some hobbits by now?
There was one, or one possible one anyway. I remember Rialian kidding her about it once on some list (I think it wasn’t ER but someplace else – this was quite a long time ago). But yeah, you’d think there’d be at least a handful of those around.
eta: I mean, she was before the films even, I’m pretty sure.
Ancient of Days
Ancient of Days
technobushi said:
As for goblins…well, goblins aren't glamorous and pretty enough. Duh.
Â
We have heard of goblin-kin but have not run into any personally. Goblin-spirits, on the other hand, our partner works with from time to time. Bloody things always steal my belts when I need to get dressed in the morning…
Ancient of Days
Jarandhel Dreamsinger said:
That's the thing, though… some of the types which should be popular aren't, even among the fakers. Â Take centaurs, I've seen tons of people who wish they were centaurs online. Â I've seen zero people claiming to be centaur otherkin, even after media events which should have popularized them further such as the Narnia movie or some of the Harry Potter movies or the Percy Jackson movie or even things like Hercules and Xena. Â I've seen tons of people claiming to be kitsune and oni otherkin, but I could probably count on one hand the inugami or the bakaneko, and I don't think I've ever heard of a tanuki otherkin.
Perhaps contact with the community of Others in other countries would provide some useful information insofar as your question is concerned. It would seem reasonable for the number of tanuki Others (for example) to be so low as to be non-existent in North America, but perhaps not so much in Japan.
Now that is an unusual type of otherkin. Â I doubt most people in the community would even be familiar with the mythology that comes from.
Do you refer to the rumors of closer-to-human-than-lemur lemur Others originating from Vietnam and Singapore?
Bah. I want my real text editor.
Ancient of Days
Arethinn said:
There was one, or one possible one anyway. I remember Rialian kidding her about it once on some list (I think it wasn't ER but someplace else – this was quite a long time ago). But yeah, you'd think there'd be at least a handful of those around.
eta: I mean, she was before the films even, I'm pretty sure.
Â
We know one who used to go to Walking the Thresholds. Nice chap, in the habit of smoking mugwort from a pipe. I recall a bit of drama around the time he stopped attending the gather from his side of the fence, though.
Site Admin
The Doctor said:
Perhaps contact with the community of Others in other countries would provide some useful information insofar as your question is concerned. It would seem reasonable for the number of tanuki Others (for example) to be so low as to be non-existent in North America, but perhaps not so much in Japan.
I'd find it more reasonable if North America didn't seem to have so many kitsune Others. Â Why are they here, but not other representatives of their mythological system (for lack of a better term)?
Â
Do you refer to the rumors of closer-to-human-than-lemur lemur Others originating from Vietnam and Singapore?
I'm not actually familiar with those rumors.
Bah. I want my real text editor.
If you go to your profile, you can select between several different editors (and the selection options are now visible finally). Â One of them's plaintext even.
Ancient of Days
Jarandhel Dreamsinger said:
I'd find it more reasonable if North America didn't seem to have so many kitsune Others. Â Why are they here, but not other representatives of their mythological system (for lack of a better term)?
How many are there? I know know of one (system).
If you go to your profile, you can select between several different editors (and the selection options are now visible finally). Â One of them's plaintext even.
I found it – thank you!
Site Admin
The Doctor said:
How many are there? I know know of one (system).
Well, let's see… Otherkin.net's directory lists 24 kitsune, 20 of which are based in North America (the other four being based in Germany, the UK, the Ukraine, and 1 unspecified). Â I also know of two others (one in New York and one in California) who claim to be kitsune who aren't on that list. Â I'm betting Mitsukami know of more. Â There's also a yahoo group that calls itself “A mailing list for kitsune, and kitsune lovers, and discussions of kitsune.” with 106 members, though like many otherkin groups on yahoo it seems to have been overrun by spam. Â It looks like it moved to a forum, but either the forum is defunct or it's having server problems at the moment. Â
The number could also climb much higher if you count fox therians as kitsune, depends on what you consider the line between the two. Â So, maybe not a ton in proportion to the rest of the community, but definitely a lot compared to the zero tanuki otherkin in North America. Â
I found it – thank you!
You're welcome!
Ancient of Days
Jarandhel Dreamsinger said:
Well, let's see… Otherkin.net's directory lists 24 kitsune, 20 of which are based in North America (the other four being based in Germany, the UK, the Ukraine, and 1 unspecified).  I also know of two others (one in New York and one in California) who claim to be kitsune who aren't on that list.
Two kitsune came to MythiCalia in 2007, named Alynna and Samui. (Amusingly enough, I seem to recall sighting foxes creeping around the campsite that time, which hasn’t occurred other times that I remember; mostly raccoons, which are extremely common.)
The number could also climb much higher if you count fox therians as kitsune, depends on what you consider the line between the two.
Personally I wouldn’t, but then I’m not on the inside of such a debate.
Site Admin
Arethinn said:
Two kitsune came to MythiCalia in 2007, named Alynna and Samui. (Amusingly enough, I seem to recall sighting foxes creeping around the campsite that time, which hasn't occurred other times that I remember; mostly raccoons, which are extremely common.)
Alynna is the California one I knew of. Â Sie's also the one that ran the yahoogroup I mentioned, and the kitsuhana forum… which appears not to be defunct after all, looks like it was just having server problems. Â That forum lists 165 members currently.
The number could also climb much higher if you count fox therians as kitsune, depends on what you consider the line between the two.
Personally I wouldn't, but then I'm not on the inside of such a debate.
Well, as far as I know the word kitsune in japanese just means fox-spirit, and it's hard to argue that a fox therian fits that definition. Â From what I know of the folklore, even the multi-tailed magical kitsune started out as regular foxes and grew additional tails after having lived for a certain period of time (generally 100 years). Â Of course, I am not an expert on this subject, and I'm quite sure that the twins will correct me if I've gotten any of this wrong.
Ancient of Days
Fambly
Normal Member
Site Admin
technobushi said:
You've basically gotten it right Jarin. Or another way of putting it–kitsune are to foxes what humans are to elves. Sort of. Kitsune are sentient, foxes are not. Both humans and elves are sentient already.
I don't know if I'd make that comparison, just because foxes become kitsune. Â They gain sentience with the second tail, after their first hundred years, much like objects which become Tsukumogami or cats which become Bakaneko. Â Old humans generally don't turn into elves, as far as I know.
Ancient of Days
Fambly
Jarandhel Dreamsinger said:
technobushi said:
You've basically gotten it right Jarin. Or another way of putting it–kitsune are to foxes what humans are to elves. Sort of. Kitsune are sentient, foxes are not. Both humans and elves are sentient already.
I don't know if I'd make that comparison, just because foxes become kitsune. Â They gain sentience with the second tail, after their first hundred years, much like objects which become Tsukumogami or cats which become Bakaneko. Â Old humans generally don't turn into elves, as far as I know.
Â
According to some Germanic texts, they do. I found this out by doing some cursory research on elves, something academic and NOT written within the otherkin community. The general theme seems to be marriage into an elven household, near-death experiences, and related. YMMV.
Site Admin
technobushi said:
Â
According to some Germanic texts, they do. I found this out by doing some cursory research on elves, something academic and NOT written within the otherkin community. The general theme seems to be marriage into an elven household, near-death experiences, and related. YMMV.
I should perhaps have said “on their own”. Â As far as I know, the transformation from fox to kitsune doesn't require the fox to marry into a kitsune household first, for instance.
Ancient of Days
Fambly
Jarandhel Dreamsinger said:
technobushi said:
Â
According to some Germanic texts, they do. I found this out by doing some cursory research on elves, something academic and NOT written within the otherkin community. The general theme seems to be marriage into an elven household, near-death experiences, and related. YMMV.
I should perhaps have said “on their own”. Â As far as I know, the transformation from fox to kitsune doesn't require the fox to marry into a kitsune household first, for instance.
A human can on its own turn into a kitsune OR an elf if a certain set of parameters are in place. I'm sure the twins can point you towards some resources on kitsune lore applying to that. Kvedulf Gundarrson's book could apply to the latter.
Site Admin
technobushi said:
A human can on its own turn into a kitsune OR an elf if a certain set of parameters are in place. I'm sure the twins can point you towards some resources on kitsune lore applying to that. Kvedulf Gundarrson's book could apply to the latter.
Hmm, I was thinking of something more primed through proximity and powerful bonds, like the marriage example you gave. What parameters allow a human to become a kitsune or a elf on their own?
Ancient of Days
technobushi said:
Jarandhel Dreamsinger said:
Old humans generally don't turn into elves, as far as I know.
According to some Germanic texts, they do. I found this out by doing some cursory research on elves, something academic and NOT written within the otherkin community. The general theme seems to be marriage into an elven household, near-death experiences, and related. YMMV.
The idea that the alfar are the ancestors is probably related to the idea that the human dead go Under-hill and become the faery/sidhe. I wouldn’t deny that this could happen but I don’t think it’s a matter of course, and especially not an origin explanation for the alfish and sidhe-ish kindreds. We’re our own thing which was there before human ancestral spirits started hanging out with us, IMO. (The human “Mighty Dead” are also their own phenomenon.)
Ancient of Days
Fambly
I'm aware of that theory, but there are also accounts of humans marrying elves and becoming elves themselves. Now, whether or not that actually happens or not, I have no way of knowing, and I am unsure of how the mechanics of such a thing would work. The fact that they can interbreed is well known, so there has to be a common hominid bond between the two regardless.
Newbie
Which would then also go for some other species at least in the world we inhabited, wouldn't it. I'm particularly thinking of the people we've so far failed at classifying truly and are calling dwarves for convenience. Obviously interbreedable since we have one of the results right here, and knew several more.
Newbie
Re the frequency of appearances of kintypes in modern culture influencing their numbers . . .
Â
Yes there have been more centaurs than elves in movies recently, but the centaurs don't exactly have sex appeal. If “fakers” (which is not entirely appropriate in this context, but never worry) are influenced by what they see around them, it's not just volume that matters – it's the depth and quality of the experience. Centaurs for example tend to be rather boring characters who don't do a whole lot and are difficult to empathise with. Elves, on the other hand? LotR has men and women, young looking and pretty or middle aged looking and rougher (but of course, all suitably ancient for the pathos value), with an in depth culture and a lot of emotional involvement. There's lots to inspire and empathise with. Dragons aren't represented much at all in modern films . . . but certainly when I was a kid just about everyone my age loved reading stories about dragons and they were almost always depicted as impressive, powerful, intelligent, awe-inspiring beings.
Â
If people's stated kintype is influenced by cultural representations of that kintype, what matters is not how often the representation appears. What matters is how affecting that representation is and how well it speaks to the individual on a personal level.
Most Users Ever Online: 252
Currently Online:
1 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Arethinn na'eleth aTinderel: 217
Claude: 122
technobushi: 79
Ayaka Inu: 30
The Doctor: 28
casteylan: 25
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1
Members: 586
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 6
Forums: 36
Topics: 217
Posts: 1337
Newest Members:
tonya.curtis0450, tristan.sims4151, kim.crawford3399, anna.gilbert8868, .7394, zachary.burke2674Administrators: Jarandhel Dreamsinger: 540